SAFE Vs Less Agile Scrum Frameworks

Rubric for Group Projects PMGT 573 Course

1 Author: Winston Gonzalez, D.M., SPC

Agile Team Name: ______________________ Component: ___________

Excelent Above Average Average Below Average Absent

S co re

Po ss ib le

Criteria Possible Points -‐-‐> 5 4.5 4.25 4 None 0 Project Requirements (50% weight)

0.00 Meets all requirements for this week’s component saHsfactorily

2.50 Somewhat meets requirements (at least 3) for this week’s component

2.25 Slightly meets requirements (at least 2) for this week

2.13 Slightly meets requirements (at least 1) for this week

2.00 Absent or failed to meet at least 1 requirement

0.00

CriHcal Thinking (15% weight)

0.00 Demonstrates excellent ability to work with key concepts / informaHon / process / theory related to topic by idenHfying paRerns, interpreHng challenging concepts, drawing logical conclusions, explaining component parts, and sketching potenHal applicaHons or extensions to new problems or contexts

0.75 Demonstrates above average ability to work with key concepts / informaHon / process / theory related to topic by idenHfying paRerns, interpreHng challenging concepts, drawing logical conclusions, explaining component parts, and sketching potenHal applicaHons or extensions to new problems or contexts

0.68 Demonstrates average ability to work with key concepts / informaHon / process / theory related to topic by idenHfying paRerns, interpreHng challenging concepts, drawing logical conclusions, explaining component parts, and sketching potenHal applicaHons or extensions to new problems or contexts

0.64 Demonstrates below average ability to work with key concepts / informaHon / process / theory related to topic by idenHfying paRerns, interpreHng challenging concepts, drawing logical conclusions, explaining component parts, and sketching potenHal applicaHons or extensions to new problems or contexts

0.60 Absent or lacks connecHon to key concepts / informaHon / process / theory related to topic

0.00

Teamwork and CollaboraHon (10% weight)

0.00 Through retrospecHve and self assessment, demonstrates excellent contribuHons to group tasks as individuals, recognizing how to maximize group efficiency while facilitaHng the contribuHons of team members

0.50 Through retrospecHve and self assessment, demonstrates above average contribuHons to group tasks as individuals, recognizing how to maximize group efficiency while facilitaHng the contribuHons of team members

0.45 Through retrospecHve and self assessment, demonstrates average contribuHons to group tasks as individuals, recognizing how to maximize group efficiency while facilitaHng the contribuHons of team members

0.43 Through retrospecHve and self assessment, demonstrates below average contribuHons to group tasks as individuals, recognizing how to maximize group efficiency while facilitaHng the contribuHons of team members

0.40 Absent or failes to complete self-‐ reflecHon and self assessment for the week

CommunicaHon (10% weight)

0.00 WriHng is excellent within context and for purpose, using resources and evidence while controlling use of grammar and mechanics

0.50 WriHng is above average within context and for purpose, using resources and evidence while controlling use of grammar and mechanics

0.45 WriHng is average within context and for purpose, using resources and evidence while controlling use of grammar and mechanics

0.43 WriHng is below average within context and for purpose, using resources and evidence while controlling use of grammar and mechanics

0.40 Absent or fails to communicate as expected

0.00

Timeliness (10% weight)

0.00 Weekly submission completed on-‐Hme

0.50 Weekly submission completed with 1 day delay

0.45 Weekly submission completed with 2 days delay

0.43 Weekly submission completed with 3+ days delay

0.40 Absent or fails to submit within 1 week from due date

0.00

Built-‐In Quality (5% weight)

0.00 Product meets all format requirements, reads well, and is organized by components

0.25 Product meets most, but not all format requirements, reads okay, and is organized by components

0.23 Product meets some, but not the majority of forma`ng requirements

0.21 Product meets some formaHng requirements with too many issues

0.20 Absent or fails to format end result as required

0.00

Total 0.00 5.00 4.50 4.25 4.00 0.00