Info-Graphic Assessment

Assessment Information

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.

Assessment 1 Information

Subject Code: MBA642 Subject Name: Project Initiation, Planning and Execution Assessment Title Success and Failure Factors Assessment Type: Length:

Infographic 1000 words (+/- 10% allowable range)

Weighting: 30% Total Marks: Submission:

100 Online via MyKBS

Due Date: Week 5 .

Your task Construct an infographic that investigates the success factors and failure factors in a major Australian project from any industry. Assessment Description. In this individual assessment, students will be given an opportunity to analyse the organisational factors that promote effective project management by considering the project management planning and execution phases and analyse the elements that may give rise to ethical compromises.

Assessment Instructions

• Nominate a specific major Australian project of your choosing and in an infographic format, analyse in detail both the steps critical for its success and the critical pitfalls that could lead to its failure.

• Integrate the ethical considerations into these steps and show how ethical considerations may impact the success or failure of the chosen project.

• Analyse in detail, how and why these steps are critical. • You may use one case study for the success factors and another for the failure factors, or the same

project for both. • The following link is one of many where you can find free infographic templates

https://www.canva.com/create/infographics/ • There will be additional information which gives a fuller description of the assessment requirements

along with KBS presentation guidelines. This will be posted on the myKBS Assessment page. • Please refer to the assessment marking guide to assist you in completing all the assessment criteria.

You are required to use at least 10 sources of information and reference these in accordance with Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style. These may include websites, government publications, industry reports, census data, journal articles, and newspaper articles. These references should be presented as a reference list at the end of your report.

https://www.canva.com/create/infographics/

Assessment Information

Assignment Submission Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered as a legitimate submission. MyKBS will notify you if there is an issue with the submitted file. In this case, you must contact your workshop facilitator via email and provide a brief description of the issue and a screenshot of the MyKBS error message. You are also encouraged to submit your work well in advance of the deadline to avoid any possible delay with the Turnitin similarity report or any other technical difficulties.

Late assignment submission penalties Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business School “late assignment submission penalties” policy.

Number of days

Penalty

1* – 9 days 5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks available

10 – 14 days 50% deducted from the total marks available. After 14 days Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after

the due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive a mark of zero for the assignment(s).

Note Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have been returned to students

*Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to be one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty

For more information, please read the full policy via https://www.kbs.edu.au/wp- content/uploads/2019/07/KBS_Assessment-Policy_June-2019_Final.pdf

https://www.kbs.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/KBS_Assessment-Policy_June-2019_Final.pdf

Assessment Information

Important Study Information

Academic Integrity Policy

KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.

What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties? How can I appeal my grade?

Click here for answers to these questions: http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/.

Word Limits for Written Assessments

Submissions that exceed the time limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded.

Study Assistance

Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.

http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/

https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481

MBA642 Assessment Marking Rubric – Individual Infographic 30%

Marking Criteria

F (Fail) 0 – 49%

P (Pass) 50 – 64%

C (Credit) 65 – 74%

D (Distinction) 75 – 84%

HD (High Distinction) 85 -100%

Analysis of Success Factors __/20 marks

The analysis does not move beyond a description of the

learning experience.

Attempts to analyse success factors, but these are vague

and unclear.

Analyses several of the success factors and makes

several connections to how the learning can be applied.

Analyses many of the success factors and makes many

connections to how the learning can be applied

There is an in-depth analysis of the success factors and the value

of the derived learning.

Analysis of Fail Factors __/20 marks

The analysis does not move beyond a description of the

learning experience.

Attempts to analyse fail factors, but these are vague

and unclear.

Analyses several of the fail factors and makes several

connections to how the learning can be applied.

Analyses many of the fail factors and makes many connections to how the learning can be applied

There is an in-depth analysis of the fail factors and the value of

the derived learning.

Ethical Considerations __/20 marks

The analysis does not move beyond a description of the

learning experience.

Attempts to analyse ethical considerations, but these are vague and unclear.

Analyses several of the ethical considerations and makes

several connections to applying the learning.

Analyses many of the ethical considerations and makes many connections to how the learning

can be applied

There is an in-depth analysis of the ethical considerations and the

value of the derived learning.

Structure and Formatting __/20 marks

The writing style is unclear; lacks logical flow and structure;

numerous spelling and grammatical errors.

Writing style lacks clarity, flaws in flow and structure,

some use of discipline- specific academic language,

several spelling or grammatical errors

The writing style is mostly clear; Mostly written in discipline-

specific academic language; Some spelling or grammatical

errors.

The writing style is clear; Correct use of discipline-specific academic language: some minor spelling or

grammatical errors.

The writing style is clear; Fluent use of discipline-specific

academic language: no spelling or grammatical errors.

Theory, research and referencing __/20 marks

Total marks __/100

Many errors in logical flow and structure, argument sourced from non-academic literature. No discussion of academic

research. Cites very few sources.

Some errors in logical flow and structure, basic

discussion of relevant theory sourced from a minimal

number of academic sources. Little discussion of

relevant research.

Sound logical flow and structure, a broad discussion of

relevant theory sourced from academic literature. Relevant

research acknowledged but not discussed. Cites several

academic sources.

Good logical flow and structure, an argument supported by detailed

relevant theory and research sourced from numerous

and varied academic sources.

Excellent logical flow and structure, an argument supported by a comprehensive discussion of relevant theory and research

sourced from numerous and varied academic sources.

Feedback and grades will be released via Turnitin.